Posts tagged IAWTV
1:07 pm - Mon, Dec 5, 2011
19 notes

rafimama:

Last week a Credit Suisse analyst reported that paid TV services like Cable and Satellite will lose 200,000 subscribers next year citing that there is a generation of viewers called ‘Cord-Nevers’ that will never subscribe for those services. 

In a follow up article titled, “TV’s Scariest Generation: The Cable-Nevers’, Bernard Gershon digs deeper into this new generation:

Cord-nevers - This is the most troubling group for the traditional operators. They are graduating college, leaving the nest and have become comfortable finding their viewing choices online. They don’t recognize networks - they know “shows.”

Before ‘on-demand’ viewing became prominent, the only way to ensure a viewer would have access to their favorite content was to bucket them into networks.   This was the great allure of cable.  A channel dedicated to music, comedy, sports, cooking, etc.  Cable networks found that there was a growing number of viewers interested in niche content and that those viewers would watch their network as long as they knew that they could find content that would appeal to them on that specific channel at any given time.  They were the Independents.  They were underdogs.

Now that viewers can watch pretty much anything they want on demand, the position on the dial is less important.  I can’t remember if ‘Mad Men’ is on AMC or Bravo.  Or if ‘It’s Always Sunny..’ is on Fox or FX or TBS… no idea.  

The new generation of viewers know shows, not networks.  

This will continue to be true for network TV programs as well as independently produced web series.  It won’t matter if a show was created for FX, TBS, HBO, or if it was distributed online only.   Great shows will reach their audience no matter how remote and quirky they are.  As long independent web series continue to be creative and unique in their approach to creating content, these cord-nevers will find the content they want.

I agree completely. Unfortunately, we don’t operate in a limited, closed system like cable TV. With web shows, what I’m seeing is a similar pattern but exacerbated by our inefficiency as an industry to brand ourselves outside of networked silos like Blip, YouTube, MyDamnChannel, Koldcast, Revision 3, etc..

By that I mean, audiences identify primarily with shows - I agree. However, video portal discovery is in its infancy and platform cross-promotion is basically non-existent. A viewer may discover a show on a particular network and thus find other shows they like on that network, but cross-site audience sharing by content genre and audience vertical is an uncracked nut. For the most part, this is in the network’s interests (better to keep the viewer on that site watching a “related” show they may or may not like rather than send them somewhere else to watch a highly relevant recommendation on another site). But it has a damaging effect as well:

If a viewer knows about Revision 3, they probably know of most of the shows there but may have never heard of other portals like Blip or The Escapist. Blip’s new layout definitely improves discovery within other Blip shows (as does YouTube’s) but due to the massive scale of those sites I doubt there’s anyone (maybe Eric and Steve, but not on the customer side) who is familiar with ALL the shows, or even all the related ones. If I like You Suck at Photoshop (MyDamnChannel), how do I find other shows like it I would enjoy as well if they’re not on MDC? 

If you look at the cross promotion The Guild (MSN/YouTube) did with The Legend of Neil (Atom) you have a rare instance of cross-network familiarity (due to shared cast members), which may have led to Guild/LoN audiences discovering Video Game Reunion (also Atom), but those fans don’t necessarily know about gaming related shows on other networks like Project:LORE (Revision 3), Gold: the Series (Blip), Zero Punctuation (The Escapist), etc. ad infinitum.

So, yes, viewers identify with shows over networks. But the web is a URL destination based delivery system with very few ways to discover content from one site to another (Google is useless for this). Until someone solves that discovery problem, a casual viewer who finds a show they like will have a difficult time finding the best related content in that vertical or genre. Similarly, advertisers cannot currently buy audience at scale based on cross-site aggregation of interest segments (i.e. I want to run McCormick Seasoning ads across all the best cooking and food-related shows on the web).

It’s not up to the distribution networks to solve this problem even if they could: on the viewer side, you need a cross platform curator (Tosh 2.0 or Ain’t It Cool News for web series), a TV Guide (Clicker started this but lost steam), or an industry representative with cross channel interests (the IAWTV, perhaps) to be vested in optimizing audience aggregation around shows on the web. Running cross platform advertising on web shows is a much more technical issue and I’ll leave that opportunity to some other entrepreneur. ;)

No one asks “where can I find the best networks online?”, but they DO ask “where can I find the best shows online?” and, for the moment at least, there is no easy answer: the best we’re offering them is networks, not shows.

11:02 am - Mon, Jul 11, 2011
4 notes

Ballots for the Board of Directors election should be hitting IAWTV members’ inboxes shortly. In an effort to expand the coverage of the election, the Communications Committee offered all candidates a chance to make a 90 second video (Vice Chair Patrick Bardwell handled this, since I’m myself a candidate). The videos are now live and you can see them all here: http://youtube.com/IAWTVorg

My own candidate video ended up being a bit of a challenge. Not surprisingly, I had a lot to say. After 4 attempts to trim my thoughts on my candidacy and the election into a minute and a half, I threw out a ton of footage and ended up with this instead. It runs more like a PSA than a campaign video, but at least I can say it encompasses my thoughts on this election.

4:14 am - Sun, Jul 10, 2011
7 notes

I now have a place to put videos about videos, most specifically the web television industry.

Topics will include marketing, distribution, advertising and sponsorships, the IAWTV, and the like. I hope you’ll check it out and subscribe. I expect you’ll see more than a few familiar faces being interviewed before too long.

-Jeff 

2:08 pm - Tue, Jun 21, 2011
4 notes
Happy to announce that I have been appointed Chair of the International Academy of Web Television’s Communications Committee, with Slebisodes founder Patrick Bardwell as Vice-Chair.

Very much looking forward to the challenges and opportunities ahead.

Happy to announce that I have been appointed Chair of the International Academy of Web Television’s Communications Committee, with Slebisodes founder Patrick Bardwell as Vice-Chair.

Very much looking forward to the challenges and opportunities ahead.

12:45 pm - Thu, Oct 7, 2010
5 notes

Jack Ferry ($99 Music Videos) is a member of the International Academy of Web Television’s Membership Committee and a proponent for open enrollment in the organization - that is to say that anyone who wants to be a member of the IAWTV, can be.

I highly recommend you read, and comment on, his post stating his case.

With the IAWTV in a period of defining itself, your feedback is important to help ensure that the organization makes the best choices on an important decision.

2:52 am - Tue, Jul 20, 2010
5 notes

Webseries Poker: Playing Your Cards Right

“I had Kings…” - Neal Bannen

If you know how to play poker - Texas Hold ‘Em specifically - you’re gonna be ok for this post. If not, well, it might not make much sense. You’ve been warned.

The impetus of this idea, as is often the case with ideas, was the convergence of two disparate events; in this case, a long and excellent webseries discussion with the Maestro, Tom Konkle (Safety Geeks: SVI, Invention with Brian Forbes) followed by the train home during which, like all my train rides home, I occupied myself with my Blackberry’s poker app.

I went on a run of pocket 2’s and 3’s. Three hands in a row I was dealt either a pair of twos or a pair of threes. “I wish those were aces,” thinks I, and the part of my brain that does math (always the slowest and least exercised cavity of my mind) points out that statistically you’re just as likely to be dealt pocket aces as you are pocket 2’s (221:1 - I looked it up). Each is just as likely, and yet it’s a whole lot easier to win with aces than to win with deuces. That’s the game.

“Profound,” thinks I, automatically downplaying any dismay I might feel over having been playing poker for years and this is just now occurring to me. “There’s a lesson in that, but what?”

It’s not that you can’t win with twos, it’s just far far less likely. Winning with pocket twos, even for the masters, requires an overwhelming confluence of playing skill and luck.

What does this have to do with webseries? Well, this is what I came up with:

Your Show is Your Hand

We’ve all heard the old adage about playing the hand that you’re dealt. It’s a bad adage, really. Almost any poker player can tell you that you should only play the hands you think you can win with. In general, you fold 7-2 and you play Ace-King suited. The goal of playing the hand is to win it, so most good players choose not to make that any harder than it already is. Fold your bad ideas, know when you can get away with placing your bet on 10-J, and don’t be afraid to wait for a monster hand to come up before putting all your chips in. There are very few people in this world that can play any hand and still make money.

The Medium is the Deck

In this medium, all cards are identical until the hand is played. Online video gives you the basic tools of the game. It tells you that you have 2 through Ace of Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs, and Spades to work with. And yet, those basic tools lead to a staggering number of possible hands and play styles.

You Are the Player

Seems obvious, right? There are elements in this industry, however, that want to convince you otherwise. They’ll tell you that you are the hand and they will bet on you or fold you at their whim. They’ve set up an elaborate table and have convinced you that the only way to get on it is to be the hand. With the internet, this deception has never been more transparent. YOU were ALWAYS the Player, and the hand was always your SHOW. In the old model, creators were convinced that the only way to win (or even sit down) was to let someone else play their hands for them. The explosion of creativity that has led to the IAWTV, YouTube’s creator driven community, and the proliferation of online shows stems from a dawning realization that you, the creator, are the Player and you always have been. Many of us make shows and put them online for no (or almost no) money because it reminds us thet we’re in control of the hand, not the industry.

The Industry is the Board 

The Board, otherwise aptly known as the community cards, make up 3/5ths of your hand. If the flop, turn, and river are working in your favor, your two cards become unbeatable. If they’re working against you, even the best starting hand can lose.

The ideal job of the distributors, agents, management, unions, guilds, and organizations like the IAWTV, is to lay out the most beneficial community (cards) possible. If the board is four Aces and a King, every hand wins and splits the pot. That’s idealistic in webseries and poker, however. What we can work for in building this space is to do our best to ensure that none of community cards are actively busting our flushes.

Marketing is the Playing Skill

When two players face off with identical hands, it’s inevitably the player with the most skill who wins. Likewise, between two similar shows the one that does a better job of getting out there and garnering attention is the one that will come out on top. Good marketing can make a lesser hand a winner. You can win with pocket 2s, but you’re going to have to play your ass off. And you’re going to have to get some kind of luck on your side, because…

Luck is Still Luck

It was tempting when considering this analogy to equate the audience with luck. Afterall, like luck, the audience can seem fickle and difficult to keep on your side. However, in the end, even the best hand played perfectly will often still need some luck to really win big. Luck is still luck. And the audience?

The Audience Just Wants to be Entertained

No matter what goes into how you play the game; how many books you read, how much you practice, how how much work and sleepless nights you put into it… at the end of the day, most of the audience just wants to see a great hand played brilliantly. Sure, some of your fans are aspiring pros trying to learn from your example, and those will be the ones you probably talk to most often as they hunt you down to pick your brains for tips and the minutiae of your grand strategy, but that’s the minority. Most of them, they could care less why you’d play Q-10 on the button but not on the blind. If you want the audience on your side, don’t make showing them your process the most important thing, focus on giving them what they want. 

Give them a great hand played brilliantly, and they’ll be entertained. They’ll want to see you win.

Now then, who’s up for an East Coast New Media poker night?

4:20 pm - Fri, Jul 9, 2010
6 notes

Establishing a brand identity for an industry: What is a Webseries?

After many conversations on branding, outreach, and education for the webseries industry, I’m happy to announce my intention to launch a new community project, http://whatisawebseries.com, a web site that serves a very basic purpose: it answers the all too common question “What is a Webseries?”

The simple truth is we need an easy to remember location that provides an explanation of what it is we do, whether for our families and friends, the media, future creators, or potential sponsors and investors.

WiaW will serve as an encyclopedia with only one entry… a university with only one subject. In it’s most basic, top level form, it will be a place for the idly curious to grasp in a few seconds the concept behind our industry. Eventually, I would like the site to become a comprehensive overview of the industry and its history.

I can really only work on it on weekends at this point (this project is unaffiliated with CJP, and my work there comes first), but I hope to have the site launched within a few weeks – at least in a basic form (this is what a webseries is, these are some examples of shows, these are a few sites you can watch them on).

In the meantime, anyone who would like to help with the project is welcome to contact me. Help with writing content, graphic design, or coding are all appreciated.

Prior to the site going live, I welcome your thoughts and input on the project. I’ve created a FB fan page with a Discussions tab for an ongoing discussion of what content the site should have, and how that content will be organized. You can find it here:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/What-is-a-Webseries/133448053356220

The site also has a Twitter account for announcements, just follow http://twitter.com/WhatsaWebseries

In order to mitigate the costs of developing, launching, and maintaining the site, I’ve created a modest crowdfunding project on IndieGoGo. Obviously, supporting the site with a financial contribution is not required. However, as an incentive to helping me get this off the ground, I’m pre-selling ad spots for webseries shows for anyone who contributes $50 or more. (The site will NOT be for profit or ad supported, I’m putting ads for shows on the site to help you promote your work and use your show as an example for visitors of the site, similar to what I did with Broadcast Assassin.)

If you don’t have your own show (or even if you do, I guess) you can certainly reserve ad space on behalf of a show you like but aren’t involved with.

The IndieGoGo project can be found here:

http://www.indiegogo.com/What-is-a-Webseries

I’ll be making the site available to the IAWTV Communications Committee for certain things, if they wish, and welcome the Standards Committee to leverage the site for passing along whatever recommendations they eventually arrive at. Additionally, I will be exploring possible ways to integrate the site with Clicker’s web originals directory, WebTVdb (when that gets going full steam), the broadband content networks, and the community at large.

This is not my project, really. It belongs to and benefits all of us. I’m just taking the initiative and getting the ball rolling.

And when the site is live, not only will the industry finally have an outlet for branding itself, but we’ll finally have an easy answer the next time someone asks us “Webseries? What’s that?’

4:46 pm - Wed, Jun 30, 2010
25 notes

Andrew Baron offers an alternate opinion on the current direction of the IAWTV. I had a conversation with him on these topics fairly recently, and while I don’t agree with him on every topic (like the IAWTV setting recommendations for industry standards), I do feel he’s an extremely smart guy whose perspective is worth taking into consideration.

It’s been unlike me to be completely quiet about this. I received the first email and have ever since been on “the list” I guess. I’ve been invited to participate in the Streamy’s which you are concerned about and possibly run, I’ve been invited to vote on them, Rocketboom has been nominated on…

4:51 pm - Thu, Jun 17, 2010

The Delicious Scent of IAWTV

Two quick unrelated notes:

1) The Los Angeles IAWTV meeting is tonight. Based on Tuesday’s NY meeting, most of the time will likely be spent on the newly announced committees and establishing a structure for electing replacement board members. The IAWTV  letter discussing the new committees and their functions, originally intended for members but leaked and published on WebSeriesNetwork.com, is excerpted below.

Now that the IAWTV is gearing up to really take some action and solicit the active involvement of its membership, I’m really interested to see what the buy-in from the LA side of the community is like. The committees, if supported by the membership and greater webseries community, have the potential to be important catalysts propelling things forward, with knowledgeable industry vets at the wheel.

2) Want to know what’s catching my attention? I’m still getting into the habit of using it regularly, but you can check out what’s been catching my eye by taking a peek at my new Delicious bookmarking profile: http://delicious.com/broadcastassassin

-Jeff

Letter from Elizabeth Flack, IAWTV Exec. Director, to IAWTV Membership:

Dear Academy Members,

My sincerest thanks for everyone’s support and patience during the
last couple weeks, while we prepared a plan to move the Academy
forward. At last Friday's Board meeting the formation of five key
committees, which are vital to helping the Academy become operational,
were approved. The committees are:

Awards
Communications
Events
Industry Standards
Technologies

We’ll also be reactivating the Membership Committee to begin reviewing
new applicants and addressing concerns surrounding the current
application process.

For those of you who have already volunteered, I will be in touch in
touch shortly about how you can start helping right away with work on
these committees. For members who have yet to volunteer, if you are
inspired to donate your time and expertise to one of these committees,
please feel free to contact me at (REDACTED).

...(snipped)...

In the near future the Academy will be calling for nominations and
holding elections to fill the open Board seats for the rest of the
term which expires at the end of this year, so please keep an eye on
your email and the member forum for election information.

And last, but not least, don’t forget to mark your calendars for the
next membership meetings in New York and Los Angeles, where we will be
talking more in depth about moving the organization forward.

IAWTV Membership Meeting – New York
June 15, 2010 @ 2:00pm (EST)


IAWTV Membership Meeting – Los Angeles
June 17, 2010 @ 7:00pm (PST)

Best,
E


--
Elisabeth A. Flack
Executive Director
International Academy of Web Television
12:00 pm - Fri, May 14, 2010

IAWTV: A Stumble in the Right Direction

Wednesday night’s meeting in Los Angeles of the IAWTV members and its board was, as far as I can tell, best characterized as “a stumble in the right direction”. Not surprisingly (it was the bodies first major meeting, preceded only by a sparsely attended warm up in NY), little was definitively accomplished, but those attending were given a chance to speak and many issues were brought up for discussion.

For a recap and commentary on the meeting, check:

NewTeeVee’s summary, by Liz Miller: http://newteevee.com/2010/05/13/the-iawtv-is-figuring-out-what-it-wants-to-be-when-it-grows-up

New Mediacracy #13, recorded immediately following the meeting: http://newmediacracy.com/2010/05/episode-13-the-one-about-the-iawtv.html

Casey McKinnon’s commentary: http://www.caseymckinnon.com/blog/appearances/2010/05/13/all-talk-no-action-yet/

Jenni Powell’s (highly unbiased) account: http://www.jennipowell.com/2010/05/14/iawtv-town-hall-meeting-a-summary-and-thoughts/

Felicia Day’s (who did not attend due to filming) thoughts: http://feliciaday.com/blog/iawtv

The various Twitter posts on it: http://twitter.com/#search?q=iawtv

The next meetings are scheduled in NY and LA a month from now, June 15th and 17th, respectively.

In the interim, IAWTV members can share their thoughts with the board by participating in the newly created forums at http://iawtv.org

Later today I’ll be posting my thoughts on what the board, the membership, and the community can do to prepare for next month’s meetings.

Following
Likes
More Likes
Install Headline